Traffic stats for this subreddit are publicly available here. Next, imagine a world in which most people could speak a global language, but still had their native language as a primary form of communication. You will not be able to connect to you history or heritage.
Please keep this place civil. Upvote and downvote in accordance with how one is contributing to the discussion.
Prior to the dispersion spoken of in the preceding chapter, though obviously it may have been subsequent to that event, if, as the above-named author believes, the present paragraph refers to the Shemites alone.
Vice versa the English language had no words for many things in the Blackfoot culture. There are some positives but i think that the negatives out weigh the positives.
There is a strong social division between people who believe that it would be better to have one single language all over the world and other who defend that diversification of languages is not an obstacle to have good international relations.
Also the people who have to change their language would lose some of their cultural identity and their own identity. Some examples of the disadvantages would be that all of the other languages would disappear and when these languages disappear so does the knowledge that was passed on in the culture that spoke the language.
People on the Earth now and in the past have been accidentally killed because of misunderstandings due to differing languages. The same thing goes for music.
Same for food companies, it would be a load off of their shoulders because they only have to print one language! It would also assimilate different cultures because they would lose there languages and cultures.
One of which would be cultural issues where all other previous beliefs would cease to exist and people would not have a choice of what to believe in. Reply Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
One of which would be cultural issues where all other previous beliefs would cease to exist and people would not have a choice of what to believe in.
If there was ever an emergency where there were people all around you who didn't speak the same language, how would you let them know there is an emergency if they wouldn't understand you anyways?
I noticed this after I just viewed the movie "Saving Private Ryan" in which about 17 minutes in a pair of German soldiers were surrendering to the Americans, but were trying to do so in the harsh sounding language of German. Some people might say it would reduce the amount of miscommunications and make it easier to communicate.
Low effort comments, jokers and trolls beware! That changes once race becomes relevant. Nothing but the sanctifying grace of the Holy Spirit can remove the sinful lusts of the human will, and the depravity of the human heart. It would take away a lot of diversity in the world.
If everyone in the world spoke only one language, it would be a lot easier to understand what they are saying.
But I think we have been communicating alright for hundreds of years and we would lose more than we would gain from a universal language.If everyone spoke one language, would it lead to better international relations? There Is a strong social division between people who believe that it would be better to have one single language all over the world and other who defend that diversification of languages Is not an obstacle to have good International relations.
Let’s break down what the world might look like if we all spoke one language. Economics According to The Guardian, in one study by Professor James Foreman-Peck of the UK’s Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, poor language skills cost the economy a £48 billion ($B) a.
Jan 22, · On one hand, everyone speaking one language would make for easier communication, would perhaps improve international relations as people from different areas could more easily understand and relate to one another, would reduce costs and logistical challenges of international trade and business, etc.
Let’s break down what the world might look like if we all spoke one language. Economics According to The Guardian, in one study by Professor James Foreman-Peck of the UK’s Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, poor language skills cost the economy a £48 billion ($B) a year, or % of GDP.
Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. New Living Translation At one time all the people of the world spoke the same language and used the same words. English Standard Version At first everyone spoke the same language, Good News Translation.
The idea that one country is better than another just because they speak one language would be forgotten. Everyone could get along and maybe even the wars would fade away, eventually. Also, communication would no longer be a problem.Download